Dr. Jack L. Arnold Equipping
Pastors International Genesis
Lesson 15
The First Man
Genesis 2:5-25
I. MANÕS ENVIRONMENT (2:5-5)
A. Vs. 5: It is obvious that different conditions prevailed on
earth in those early days than prevail now. There was no rain; yet there was
lush vegetation. Man was created to till the ground.
B. Vs. 6: There was no rain upon the earth, but a mist watered
the ground (a water canopy). This condition probably remained until the days of
the Flood when it rained for the first time on the earth.
II. MANÕS CREATION (2:7): God created AdamÕs body first from the
dust of the ground and it is not stated as to how He did it. It is interesting
to note that the same elements that are found in the dust of the ground are
also found in the human body. The Bible also tells us that man returns to the
dust. Man is more than body. Man is also a soul and spirit. It says that God
created the immaterial part of man and he became a living soul. Even animals
have souls but this verse also states that God Òbreathed into his nostrils the
spirit of life. Man also received a spirit from God, which distinguishes him
from the animal world, for it is the spirit in man that gives him his religious
nature and the ability to communicate with God (Rom. 6:16). NOTE. Man is no animal. He is a special creation of God designed for the purpose of
glorifying God. NOTE. Because of sin, manÕs spirit became
marred. Now manÕs spirit is dead to God. God intended manÕs spirit to
communicate with Him. The natural man will always be restless, unsatisfied and
have an unending search for answers until he gets re-created through Christ.
III. MANÕS ORIGINAL HOME (2:8-14)
A. Vs. 8: God created a garden (sheltered, protected spot) in
the area of Eden (delight). The name of the garden is not given to us. The name
of it was not Eden; it was a garden placed in the land of Eden. Some have
suggested that this garden was in (1) the Persian Gulf; (2) Armenia; or (3)
Babylonia. We just cannot be sure.
B. Vs. 9: There was in the garden two trees: the tree of life
and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. The literalness of this account
has been questioned but it should not be difficult to understand how partaking
of fruit could affect mankind. In the modern drug culture, we now know that
there are drugs and chemical agents, such as are present in fruits and other
plants, that can have an effect upon man. Perhaps these trees were terribly
potent for immortality and for good and evil.
C. Vs. 10-14: While no one can be absolutely certain it appears
that the garden of Eden was probably somewhere in Armenia. Two of the rivers
can still be identified. The Hiddekel River is the Tigris, and the Euphrates
still bears that name. The other two rivers are perhaps identical with certain
streams, which still flow, one into the Black Sea and the other into the
Caspian Sea; both arise out of the mountain of Ararat in Armenia, where the ark
rested after the Flood. This account describes something that existed before
the Flood changed the geography of the earth. NOTE. Greek mythology, in the story of Jason and the Golden
Fleece, has the setting in the same area. Perhaps this was
an area where there was much gold.
IV. MANÕS WORK (2:15): From the very beginning man was intended
to work and work is one of the fundamental principles of manÕs existence. Man
was created to dress and keep the garden to the glory of God. A man who does
not work at something soon dies. NOTE.
Perhaps the task of man in that garden was to learn there the secrets that
would enable him to turn the rest of the earth into a garden. But because man
failed in the garden, he was unable to discover those secrets and, instead of
turning the world into a garden, he is turning it into a garbage dump.
V. MANÕS RESPONSIBILITY (2:16-17)
A. Vs. 16: God gave man much freedom within the garden and he
could eat of every tree except one.
B. Vs. 17: Adam was not to eat of the tree of the knowledge of
good and evil or he would die (spiritually and one day physically). God placed
this prohibition in the garden to remind Adam that he was a creature and had a
responsibility to a Supreme Being. ManÕs life was to be limited by obedience,
GodÕs law being the standard of his life. The future of the human race centered
upon AdamÕs choice. NOTE. The
consequences of eating of this tree can be seen in Genesis 3:5 when Satan said
to Eve, Òand ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.Ó Satan told a truth
but perverted it for when man ate of the tree he did become like God in one
sense -- he now knew good from evil. God cannot
experience evil but knows of evil as it relates to His perfect holiness. He
relates evil to himself. God is the only one that can properly do this. God is the only Being in all the universe that has the right to relate all things to
Himself. When a creature tries this he gets into trouble, for man, because of
sin, thinks he is God and begins to relate all things to himself. He becomes
eccentric and thinks the world revolves around him. Now the good that he knows
is perverted and the evil he practices is rationalized. The knowledge of good
and evil made man think he was the center of the universe; he became like God.
But it was really all a lie. Man is not the center of the universe, and he
cannot be. God is the center and only then man is rightly related to God can he
understand that God is at the center of the universe, NOTE. The problem with
our unbalanced society and world today is that we have an earth filled with 6
billion eccentrics all doing Òtheir own thing.Ó NOTE. But the gospel teaches that Christ redeems man through
faith, and once again, a balanced life is maintained and everything once again
relates to God. God now becomes the center of things, even though it may take
much time for the Christian to enter into this experientially.
VI. MANÕS MATE (2:18-25)
A. Vs. 18
1. In all of GodÕs previous creation, He
said it was good, but now He sees that Adam is in need of human fellowship and
says, Òit is not good.Ó NOTE. God
was satisfied with Adam but it was Adam who was incomplete because man is a
social being.
2. Adam was lonely and God brought him a
companion to fill that void in his life. NOTE. Loneliness is a perfectly
natural human experience. Loneliness is shattering to happiness and is the
single greatest factor in suicide.
POINT: Loneliness is really an attitude for it is possible to have mate
and still be lonely, for real satisfaction cones through knowing God as Adam
found out. Yet, woman was made for manÕs companionship.
3. Woman was also to be a helper for man.
She was to be someone to share not only his life as a companion but his work
and responsibilities as well! Much of marriage is sharing and communicating.
4. Woman is also a complement to man for
the words Òmeet for manÓ literally means Òsuited for him,Ó speaking of the fact
that woman was to be manÕs counterpart. NOTE. It is very humbling for a man to realize that he is not
complete without a woman. Every man needs a woman, unless he has the God-given
gift of celibacy.
B. Vs. 19-20: This section about Adam naming all the animals
seems to be out of context, for what does this have to do with his helpmate?
God gave Adam the project of naming the animals to show him that his wife was
to be different than the animals. Adam could not have given names to the
animals without knowing the character of each, because a name always reflects
character. There are three things in naming the animals that Adam learned about
his wife:
1.
Woman is not a slave. God
taught Adam that woman was not to be a beast of burden as she so often has been
in the human race. Some societies treat animals better than women. NOTE. When a
woman feels she is just a Òthing,Ó a slave, she will rebel and not be good
wife.
2. Woman is not just to reproduce
children Animals basic reason for existence is to bear
children, not so a woman. A woman is to be loved and cared for.
3. Woman is not to be used. Man has to learn that a woman is not a ÒthingÓ
outside of him to be used as he sees fit and then disposed of, as man uses
animals.
C. Vs. 21-22: God
made woman from part of a man, teaching man that if he can love himself he can
love a woman, for woman is part of him. Perhaps God took a rib to show womanÕs
equality with man; He did not take a foot to show inferiority or the head to
show superiority.
D. Vs. 23
1. By being Òbone of bone and flesh of
fleshÓ shows that woman is one being with the man. NOTE. The man who hurts his
wife is hurting himself.
2. ÒShe shall be called woman because she
was taken out of man,Ó seems to speak of the headship of man over woman, for
woman was made for man. NOTE. It is the man who is ultimately responsible
before God for the nature and character
of the home. It is the man who must exercise leadership in
determining
the direction in which the home should go, and must, therefore, be accountable
to God for that leadership. The womanÕs responsibility is to acknowledge this
leadership.
E. Vs. 24: This verse shows the permanence of marriage. It is a
parenthetical thought put in by the author to explain permanence of the
marriage union. NOTE. The man must
leave his father and mother and establish the basic union of life (husband and
wife), setting up his own home. It
is assumed that the woman will follow the man. The act of becoming one flesh
refers to the sex act, which is the right and privilege of those who are
married. By application, this may
refer to oneness of soul, purpose and being.
F. Vs. 25: The statement that they Òwere both naked, and were
not ashamedÓ shows the beauty and holiness of sex when there was no sin. Sex is God-ordained and only man
perverts it. This may also refer to openness between man and wife with nothing
to hide. It is failure to achieve this kind of openness that lies behind so
many breakdowns in marriage today. It is a failure in communication.